🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear Ruben Amorim could survive losing against lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial European final against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, squandering the team's best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer will notice the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that United’s competitors will now be rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Over System & Philosophy

For example, this was the director , after being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like him – function on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

An Supreme Authority Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “will be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical football matters, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Soccer Order: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives poorly or fails of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this represents neoliberalism in action: the rise of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach only to fire him for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then bin him for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.