🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.